Still catching up at work, but there’s two things I didn’t want to forget to comment on.
First, before leaving for Florida, I went with the boys and my father-in-law to the Palmer center during one of the last evenings of their Xmas shopping event. Luckily, we planned on parking at One Texas Center and walking, because traffic was backed up all the way across the 1st street bridge for the Trail of Lights. Right in the middle of all those cars not moving, what could you see? The shuttlebuses that the city wanted everybody to ride.
Easy lesson for the day: If you want people to leave their cars in a remote lot and ride shuttlebuses, ensure that the shuttlebuses aren’t stuck in traffic for an hour with the cars of everybody who didn’t take your advice. It’s amazing that in this day and age, people still don’t get this – somehow we’re supposed to enjoy being stuck in traffic more because we’re on a jerky uncomfortable bus instead of in our own vehicle (which, although almost as annoying to be stuck in traffic in, at least allows for more comfort)? There’s a trivially easy solution which requires only a small amount of political spine: make one lane of Barton Springs for shuttle-buses only. Cost? A few cops who had to be there anyways, and some orange cones. After all, you already closed Barton Springs down by the restaurants anyways, right?
Second item: There is still precisely zero square feet of evident transit-oriented development along Tri-Rail in South Florida (caveat: I only observed between the Fort Lauderdale airport and the Dreher Park Zoo, in West Palm Beach, but that’s about 50 miles worth). The relevance, for those who may be coming to this late, is that Tri-Rail is almost exactly like what we’re opening here in March: a commuter rail line which runs infrequently compared to light rail, and requires transfers to shuttle buses on the destination end of essentially all trips to get where you really want to go. Despite more than a decade now of effort to subsidize, encourage, rezone, whatever, there is no, zero, KAPUT TOD on the ground there, and none under construction, and every single prospective project along those lines floated mostly by governmental entities has failed. Every. Single. One.
And here in Austin? The supposed (mislabelled) TOD along Capital Metro’s line falls exclusively into three categories: Abandoned/on hold (far suburban projects); TOD-as-excuse-for-sorely-needed-upzoning (Crestview Station); and way-too-low-density-to-be-called-TOD (Chestnut, for instance). In the second category, Crestview Station is no more dense (probably less when complete) than the Triangle, so clearly the rail transit available to Crestview has provided precisely zero additional support for density in the project (it could have been just as dense without the rail).
More later as I slowly get up to speed.
Meta
-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- m1ek on Rapid Bus versus existing conditions on the #3 corridor
- Novacek on Rapid Bus versus existing conditions on the #3 corridor
- m1ek on Rapid Bus versus existing conditions on the #3 corridor
- m1ek on Rapid Bus versus existing conditions on the #3 corridor
- Novacek on Rapid Bus versus existing conditions on the #3 corridor
Archives
- June 2013
- May 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- October 2012
- May 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- December 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- October 2004
- September 2004
- August 2004
- July 2004
- June 2004
- May 2004
- April 2004
- March 2004
- February 2004
- January 2004
- October 2003
- September 2003
Categories
- 2008 Light Rail
- Austin
- badgers
- Bicycle Commuting
- Bicycling in Austin
- Charts and Graphs
- Don't Hurt Us Mr. Krusee, We'll Do Whatever You Want
- Driving in Austin
- Economics
- Empty Buses
- Funding of Transportation
- High Grade Bile
- I Get Hate Mail
- I Told You So
- IM hilarity
- Lousy Bike Facilities
- metablog
- Music
- Personal
- Politics (Outside Austin)
- PS: I am not a crackpot
- Rapid Bus Ain't Rapid
- Red Line Myths
- Republicans Hate Poor People
- Republicans Hate Public Transportation
- Republicans Hate The Environment
- Sports
- Subsidies to Suburban Sprawl
- Technology
- Terms I Have Coined
- Texas Republicans Hate Cities
- The Shoal Creek Debacle
- This Week In The Chronicle
- Transit Field Trips
- Transit in Austin
- Transportation
- Tri-Rail
- Uncategorized
- Urban Design
- Use Cases
- Walking in Austin (Pedestrian Issues)
- When Neighborhoods Go Bad
- Worst Person In Austin
I think the Plaza Saltillo plan looks good, with decent density.
It never would have been approved without commuter rail. Commuter rail was almost a pretext for that upzoning, because I definitely agree that this rail won’t take people where they want to go.
It’s a shame about the Leander station. Polikov drew up a nice plan and the property owners had signed off on it.
Yes, but again, you don’t get TOD on commuter lines that run every 30 minutes (at best) with shuttle transfers at the other end. If Polikov’s plan had actually been built, it might have been dense-for-Leander, but it was still lower density than the Triangle, and wouldn’t have been a success anyways.
The “pretext for upzoning” is what I meant in the category 2 stuff (as it was with Crestview).
Yeah, TOD wouldn’t have had any impact on the Leander station. I viewed Polikov’s plan as an experiment — can a sorta-dense New Urbanist development succeed in the exurbs?
Four comments on your two quick hits!
1. I’m new to all of this, so fact check it, but I think Polikov’s involvement dealt with the Crystal Falls development, which is not in the Leander TOD district and is not part of the TOD being developed around Capital Metro’s Leander Station. Leander is not on hold or abandoned, it is on track. http://www.capmetroblog.blogspot.com
2. Crestview: the developers have told us that the presence of MetroRail there made the opportunity attractive and desirable…doesn’t mean that it wouldn’t have been developed on its own, without the rail line there, but maybe not as quickly.
3. Tri-Rail ridership has doubled since 2005. Last year ridership was over 4m, so the “nobody rides it” argument is wearing thin. Anyhow, one of our TOD staff tells me that Tri-Rail has 2 TOD projects underway: Deerfield Beach Station and Boca Raton Station.
4. Development takes time; Mueller planning started in 1997. Groundbreaking for the big box stuff on the frontage road happened in 2006, Dell & the first housing in 2007. It’s a tad early to declare that the Red Line TOD is a failure.
Erica, I started to rebut in comments and it got too long. A post is on the way.