A short entry; and I won’t inflict a drawing on you, so please use the power of your mind to visualize.
CAMPO has already tentatively allocated $110 million for “managed lanes” (one in each direction) on Mopac from Parmer to Town Lake and is now explaining the plan. These will, apparently, boil down to a new inside lane in each direction, with possibly flimsy barriers between them and the general-purpose lanes, similar to what you see on the northbound frontage road just north of Bee Caves Road. General-purpose lanes will have to be narrowed a bit, and some shoulder will be lost (especially the inside shoulder – which will be effectively gone).
I’m generally a moderate supporter of HOV lanes, and a stronger supporter of managed lanes. Tolling road capacity anywhere is a good move away from our current system in which urban drivers and especially non-drivers subsidize SUV-driving suburban soccer moms. Ironically, the more red-meat conservative you are around these parts, the more you apparently pine for the old Soviet method of market-clearing, at least as it applies to road capacity.
And, one of the best reasons to support HOV or managed lanes is the boost in performance and reliability it can give bus transit, which needs all the help it can get.
HOWEVER, the system considered here will do nothing to improve the performance of transit, for this reason:
To exit Mopac, the bus (or car that paid a toll) must travel through three lanes of general-purpose traffic in order to get to the exit lane.
If that traffic is backed up enough to make you want to use the toll facility, it will also be backed up enough that it will be impossible to quickly cut through to get to your exit. Much of the time savings in the managed lane will be lost at entry and exit.
This is the same problem other half-assed HOV facilities have around the country – in places like South Florida (no barrier; hard to enforce; and mostly useless during extremely high traffic periods except if you’re going all the way through where the traffic is). Likewise, this facility won’t help the commuter going to UT, or downtown; the only group it could really help dramatically would be people going from north suburb to south suburb.
IE, we’re going to spend city drivers’ gas tax money to even more excessively subsidize the suburban commuter – but just in case we might accidentally benefit the city; we’re going to do it in such a way that it only helps those who don’t live OR work in the center-city.
STUPID.
By the way, $110 million would pay for the entire commuter rail line (which won’t do anything good for Austin), OR, it could be used as a down payment on a rail transit system which will work, i.e., build a leg of real non-streetcar light-rail from downtown up to the Triangle.
Meta
-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- m1ek on Rapid Bus versus existing conditions on the #3 corridor
- Novacek on Rapid Bus versus existing conditions on the #3 corridor
- m1ek on Rapid Bus versus existing conditions on the #3 corridor
- m1ek on Rapid Bus versus existing conditions on the #3 corridor
- Novacek on Rapid Bus versus existing conditions on the #3 corridor
Archives
- May 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- October 2012
- May 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- December 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- October 2004
- September 2004
- August 2004
- July 2004
- June 2004
- May 2004
- April 2004
- March 2004
- February 2004
- January 2004
- October 2003
- September 2003
Categories
- 2008 Light Rail
- Austin
- badgers
- Bicycle Commuting
- Bicycling in Austin
- Charts and Graphs
- Don't Hurt Us Mr. Krusee, We'll Do Whatever You Want
- Driving in Austin
- Economics
- Empty Buses
- Funding of Transportation
- High Grade Bile
- I Get Hate Mail
- I Told You So
- IM hilarity
- Lousy Bike Facilities
- metablog
- Music
- Personal
- Politics (Outside Austin)
- PS: I am not a crackpot
- Rapid Bus Ain't Rapid
- Red Line Myths
- Republicans Hate Poor People
- Republicans Hate Public Transportation
- Republicans Hate The Environment
- Sports
- Subsidies to Suburban Sprawl
- Technology
- Terms I Have Coined
- Texas Republicans Hate Cities
- The Shoal Creek Debacle
- This Week In The Chronicle
- Transit Field Trips
- Transit in Austin
- Transportation
- Tri-Rail
- Uncategorized
- Urban Design
- Use Cases
- Walking in Austin (Pedestrian Issues)
- When Neighborhoods Go Bad
- Worst Person In Austin
Agreed. They shouldn’t do it half-assed. Just toll all of the lanes; let it be free when there’s no traffic.
The NY Times had an article on congestion pricing a week or so ago. They got a great quote from a George Mason economist: “Everyone accepts that if your car is stationary, it’s fine to pay for parking. But if you tell people they have to pay to move their car between two points, they think it’s crazy.”
Personally, I’d gladly pay $3 to save 30 minutes sitting in traffic, anytime, anywhere. I’m surprised that so many people value their leisure time at less than $5 or $6 per hour.