While I was up in Newark at a class for work, Jennifer Kim wrote a letter to the Statesman which is just plain awful. Since AC has promised (although not yet delivered, ahem!) a fisking of the Northcross lawsuit, it falls to me to perform this one; hat tip to DSK for the link.
I am deeply troubled by the outcome of the site plan approval for Northcross Mall. It’s wrong and embarrassing when residents believe they must protect the community by suing the city.
Me fail English? That’s unpossible! Seriously – what is she troubled by? The outcome of the approval? The approval itself? Doesn’t really matter – the process followed the rule of law. As I’ve said many times, the city is not allowed to, nor should they seek to, deny approval for a project based on dislike of the particular tenant involved.
I have worked with Responsible Growth 4 Northcross to prevent this. Ideas ranged from a public-private partnership to build a community center or other public facility, to limiting the operating hours of a Wal-Mart Supercenter. However, we failed to gain the support of the City Council.
That’s because RG4N staked out a position very early on that the presence of a Wal-Mart SuperCenter was non-negotiable. Hint: you don’t negotiate with people who have said that your presence is unacceptable.
The area is full of pedestrian-oriented businesses and family-friendly neighborhoods.
Sure it is. Why, just look at this satellite photo of Anderson Lane. Looks like new urban nirvana to me! Ignore the fact that every strip mall has a parking lot in front. Ignore the fact that the sidewalks are out in broiling heat, far away from the buildings. Ignore the first rule of urbanism. They must be pedestrian-oriented, because, well, because I say so! And when my cow orkers and I ate at various places in the area the last 2 weeks, boy, were they impressed at the pedestrian orientation near Star of India!
And what’s more family-friendly than the 2nd least dense neighborhood in the city which is also one of the slowest growing, thanks to deed restrictions and super-low-density zoning which have made the area attractive primarily to empty-nesters? Even the folks at Allandale Reporter were basically forced to admit that, and I quote, it’s one of the least dense, slowest growing neighborhoods in Austin. Hey, remember those wacky kids at RG4N who claimed a VMU project would be feasible in this spot? Remember how wacky M1EK pointed out the extremely low density of the residential catchment area? Those were they days, huh?
Don’t forget the family-friendliness of pressuring weak-willed panderers on the City Council to allow cars to park in the bike lanes on Shoal Creek Blvd, the most important bicycle commuting route in the city – both for long distance work commuters and for kids going to Northwest Park. What’s more family-friendly than making an 8-year-old swerve around parked pickup trucks four or five times before getting to the park?
It’s clear that a Wal-Mart would generate an unreasonable amount of traffic, so I sought evidence that the city could use to reject the site plan.
That’s charming! Most of us would actually look for evidence first before declaring that it was clear that a Wal-Mart would generate an unreasonable amount of traffic for a parcel zoned as a shopping mall.
I asked city staff to rerun the traffic impact analysis submitted by Lincoln Properties using the higher traffic numbers listed in a 2006 ITE Journal article on “big-box” stores, but I was told the staff lacked the software. The city asked Lincoln Properties to run the numbers, but it did not respond.
Hm. I wonder why they wouldn’t respond. Maybe it’s because they know they have the rule of law on their side?
I applaud the efforts of Responsible Growth and local neighborhood associations, and I support their vision. I hope this wonderful community involvement we have seen will triumph in the end.
So far, this wonderful community involvement has resulted in hundreds of thousands of dollars spent by the city to defend the rule of law against rule-by-mob. So far, this wonderful community involvement has led to the overthrow of one neighborhood association’s leadership in favor of a new group which has demonstrated their commitment to RG4N’s purported VMU goals by opposing VMU anywhere but at Northcross itself. So far, this wonderful community involvement has led to an increased likelihood that Northcross will end up like the Intel Shell, and that some local businesses counting on this project will go bankrupt.
So far, this wonderful letter has made me reconsider my position that Brewster was the worst panderer currently on the City Council.